fogpog.com - Staying True To Cubbie Blue
 
Chicago Cubs
Schedule
Standings
Player Stats
Roster
Depth Chart
Wrigley Field
History
2013 Standings
National League Central
TEAM W L PCT GB
St. Louis 97 65 .599 -
Pittsburgh 94 68 .580 3.0
Cincinnati 90 72 .556 7.0
Milwaukee 74 88 .457 23.0
CUBS 66 96 .407 31.0
- End of Regular Season -
Recommended Sites
Media Friends:
AskMen.com
CBS SportsLine
Chicago Bears
Chicago Bulls
Chicago Cubs
ESPN
FOX Sports
Maxim
MLB.com
Sports Illustrated
Stuff
Site Friends:
1060 West
Chicago Cubs Blog
CNLBCB
Ivy Chat
Len & Bob's Blog
MLB Rumors
fogpog Feeds
Subscribe
RSS 2.0
RSS 1.0
Java
Add to My Yahoo!
Link To Us:
fogpog.com - Staying True To Cubbie Blue

Welcome to fogpog, the best place to talk about all things related to Chicago Cubs baseball. To gain full access to fogpog you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Participate in our forums and browse from over 75,000 posts.
  • Communicate privately with other Cubs fans from around the world.
  • Create your own custom profile filled with many different features.
  • Gain access to our free arcade providing an assortment of fun and challenging games.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the fogpog Staff.

Go Back   fogpog > Cubs Baseball > The Bleachers
CUBS Tickets Gallery Arcade FP Store Donate
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Aug 26th 2013, 11:23 am
Dascenzo Dascenzo is offline
Little Leaguer
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 27
Revisiting the Cashner/Rizzo Trade

Watching the Padres/Cubs series this past weekend ignited my interest in the Rizzo/Cashner trade. At the time, the perception was that the Cubs were trading a talented but injury-prone pitcher, while receiving a player who was once the centerpiece in a trade for Adrain Gonzalez. As far as the Cubs and their fanbase were concerned, they'd pulled a fast one on San Diego. But let's take a subjective, analytical look into how both players have faired since the trade.

Cashner's career with the Padres began much like it did with the Cubs -- with an internal debate on wether he should be a starter or a reliever. In college, Cashner was a shutdown closer. But when the Cubs drafted him, they had dreams of him thriving as a starter. As soon as he was drafted, the Cubs converted Cashner to a starting pitcher, in the minors. However as soon as he was called up to the major leagues, Cashner was moved back into the bullpen; thus beginning the Cubs' symphony of indecisiveness regarding his role with the organization -- not unlike the Red Sox with Daniel Bard; and the Yankees with Joba Chamberlain.

Upon his arrival in San Diego, Cashner began his tenure as a reliever. As the season wound down, Cashner vacillated between the bullpen and the starting rotation, finishing the season with a 4.27 ERA; 2.74 SO/BB; 10.1 SO/9; and a 1.317 WHIP. This season, the Padres began stretching Cashner out into being a full-time starter. The results -- 3.55 ERA; 2.33 SO/BB; 6.2 SO/9; 1.212 WHIP. Cashner is obviously striking less batters out -- but he's also allowing less hits and weaker balls are being struck upon contact. In this being his first season as a starting pitcher, San Diego has to be excited about Cashner's future prospects.

Rizzo arrived in Chicago coming of a dismal major league debut -- .141/.281/.242 batting line, in 49 games. Naturally, the Cubs believed Rizzo needed some fine-tuning in the minors, so they started him off in AAA, to beggin the season. Rizzo proceeded to crush minor-league pitching -- .342/.405/.696 -- prompting the Cubs to promote him to the big leagues, in late June. Rizzo finished the 2012 season with 15 HR; a .285/.342/.463 line, while exhibiting above-average defensive ability at firstbase. The Cubs were ecstatic; so-much-so that they signed Rizzo to a 7 yr/$41 million-dollar contract extension, to begin this season. Rizzo has responded by providing average production. His + .103 OBP is great. So are the extra-base hits he's churning out -- 54 hits going for more than a single, including 20 Home Runs. But Rizzo has been dreadful with runners in scoring position -- .589 OPS; .177 BA -- while being equally dreadful against left-handed pitching -- .668 OPS; .195 BA. Furthermore, Rizzo has struck out 104 times, so far this season. Again, as a whole, Rizzo hasn't been terrible; just average. The problem is, the Cubs didn't invest in Rizzo with average resources -- Cashner; $41 Million.

Finally, there's age to consider. Both players are entering their prime years -- Cashner will be 27; Rizzo will be 25 -- so improvement should be expected for both, with the Cubs getting a few extra years in the age department.

Everything considered, I believe we have to reserve our judgments on this trade for at least a few more years. For now, it looks like the slight edge goes to the Padres -- ever so slight!

*Note: Apologies to Kyung-Min Na and Zach Cates -- the other two players involved in this trade.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cashner/Wells to the DL Bockstock The Bleachers 20 Apr 8th 2011 9:25 pm
Cashner Bockstock The Bleachers 8 Jul 10th 2010 10:33 am
Cashner to be called up to the pen Bockstock The Bleachers 11 Jun 2nd 2010 4:30 pm
Cashner SKIPPER 11 Minor Matters 5 Apr 19th 2010 12:34 pm
First Round Pick Cashner to Sign AceCubbie Minor Matters 5 Jul 8th 2008 4:10 pm


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:30 am.



Copyright © 2006-2013 fogpog.com. All rights reserved.
Chicago Cubs logos Copyright © 2013 Major League Baseball and the Chicago Cubs.
Powered by: vBulletin v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.